A decade in the past, federal officers drafted a plan to discourage Medicare Benefit well being insurers from overcharging the federal government by billions of {dollars} — solely to abruptly again off amid an “uproar” from the business, newly launched court docket filings present.
The Facilities for Medicare & Medicaid Providers revealed the draft regulation in January 2014. The rule would have required well being plans, when inspecting affected person’s medical data, to determine overpayments by CMS and refund them to the federal government.
However in Could 2014, CMS dropped the thought with none public clarification. Newly launched court docket depositions present that company officers repeatedly cited concern about stress from the business.
The 2014 determination by CMS, and occasions associated to it, are on the heart of a multibillion-dollar Justice Division civil fraud case towards UnitedHealth Group pending in federal court docket in Los Angeles.
The Justice Division alleges the large well being insurer cheated Medicare out of greater than $2 billion by reviewing sufferers’ data to seek out extra diagnoses, including income whereas ignoring overcharges that may scale back payments. The corporate “buried its head within the sand and did nothing however maintain the cash,” DOJ mentioned in a court docket submitting.
Medicare pays well being plans greater charges for sicker sufferers however requires that the plans invoice just for situations which might be correctly documented in a affected person’s medical data.
In a court docket submitting, UnitedHealth Group denies wrongdoing and argues it shouldn’t be penalized for “failing to comply with a rule that CMS thought of a decade in the past however declined to undertake.”
This month, the events within the court docket case made public 1000’s of pages of depositions and different data that provide a uncommon glimpse contained in the Medicare company’s long-running wrestle to maintain the personal well being plans from taking taxpayers for a multibillion-dollar journey.
“It’s simple to dump on Medicare Benefit plans, however CMS made an entire boondoggle out of this,” mentioned Richard Lieberman, a Colorado well being information analytics skilled.
Spokespeople for the Justice Division and CMS declined to remark for this text. In an e-mail, UnitedHealth Group spokesperson Heather Soule mentioned the corporate’s “enterprise practices have all the time been clear, lawful and compliant with CMS laws.”
Missed Diagnoses
Medicare Benefit insurance policy have grown explosively in recent times and now enroll about 33 million members, greater than half of individuals eligible for Medicare. Alongside the way in which, the business has been the goal of dozens of whistleblower lawsuits, authorities audits, and different investigations alleging the well being plans usually exaggerate how sick sufferers are to rake in undeserved Medicare funds — together with by doing what are known as chart opinions, meant to seek out allegedly missed prognosis codes.
By 2013, CMS officers knew some Medicare well being plans have been hiring medical coding and analytics consultants to aggressively mine affected person information — however they doubted the company’s authority to demand that well being plans additionally search for and delete unsupported diagnoses.
The proposed January 2014 regulation mandated that chart opinions “can’t be designed solely to determine diagnoses that will set off extra funds” to well being plans.
CMS officers backed down in Could 2014 due to “stakeholder concern and pushback,” Cheri Rice, then director of the CMS Medicare plan fee group, testified in a 2022 deposition made public this month. A second CMS official, Anne Hornsby, described the business’s response as an “uproar.”
Precisely who made the decision to withdraw the chart evaluate proposal isn’t clear from court docket filings up to now.
“The path that we obtained was that the rule, the ultimate rule, wanted to incorporate solely these provisions that had large, you already know, widespread stakeholder assist,” Rice testified.
“So we didn’t transfer ahead then,” she mentioned. “Not as a result of we didn’t assume it was the precise factor to do or the precise coverage, however as a result of it had blended reactions from stakeholders.”
The CMS press workplace declined to make Rice obtainable for an interview. Hornsby, who has since left the company, declined to remark.
However Erin Fuse Brown, a professor on the Brown College Faculty of Public Well being, mentioned the choice displays a sample of timid CMS oversight of the favored well being plans for seniors.
“CMS saving cash for taxpayers isn’t sufficient of a motive to face the wrath of very highly effective well being plans,” Fuse Brown mentioned.
“That’s extraordinarily alarming.”
Invalid Codes
The fraud case towards UnitedHealth Group, which runs the nation’s largest Medicare Benefit plan, was filed in 2011 by a former firm worker. The DOJ took over the whistleblower go well with in 2017.
DOJ alleges Medicare paid the insurer greater than $7.2 billion from 2009 via 2016 solely based mostly on chart opinions; the corporate would have obtained $2.1 billion much less if it had deleted unsupported billing codes, the federal government says.
The federal government argues that UnitedHealth Group knew that many situations it had billed for weren’t supported by medical data however selected to pocket the overpayments. For example, the insurer billed Medicare almost $28,000 in 2011 to deal with a affected person for most cancers, congestive coronary heart failure, and different critical well being issues that weren’t recorded within the individual’s medical document, DOJ alleged in a 2017 submitting.
In all, DOJ contends that UnitedHealth Group ought to have deleted greater than 2 million invalid codes.
As a substitute, firm executives signed annual statements testifying that the billing information submitted to CMS was “correct, full, and truthful.” These actions violated the False Claims Act, a federal legislation that makes it unlawful to submit bogus payments to the federal government, DOJ alleges.
The advanced case has featured years of authorized jockeying, even pitting the recollections of key CMS employees members — together with a number of who’ve since departed authorities for jobs within the business — towards these of UnitedHealthcare executives.
‘Crimson Herring’
Court docket filings describe a 45-minute video convention organized by then-CMS administrator Marilyn Tavenner on April 29, 2014. Tavenner testified she arrange the assembly between UnitedHealth and CMS employees on the request of Larry Renfro, a senior UnitedHealth Group govt, to debate implications of the draft rule. Neither Tavenner nor Renfro attended.
Two UnitedHealth Group executives on the decision mentioned in depositions that CMS staffers instructed them the corporate had no obligation on the time to uncover misguided codes. One of many executives, Steve Nelson, known as it a “very clear reply” to the query. Nelson has since left the corporate.
For his or her half, 4 of the 5 CMS staffers on the decision mentioned in depositions that they didn’t bear in mind what was mentioned. Not like the corporate’s group, not one of the authorities officers took detailed notes.
“All I can let you know is I bear in mind feeling very uncomfortable within the assembly,” Rice mentioned in her 2022 deposition.
But Rice and one different CMS staffer mentioned they did recall reminding the executives that even with out the chart evaluate rule, the corporate was obligated to make a good-faith effort to invoice just for verified codes — or face attainable penalties beneath the False Claims Act. And CMS officers strengthened that view in follow-up emails, based on court docket filings.
DOJ known as the flap over the ill-fated regulation a “pink herring” in a court docket submitting and alleges that when UnitedHealth requested for the April 2014 assembly, it knew its chart opinions had been beneath investigation for 2 years. As well as, the corporate was “grappling with a projected $500 million funds deficit,” based on DOJ.
Knowledge Miners
Medicare Benefit plans defend chart opinions towards criticism that they do little however artificially inflate the federal government’s prices.
“Chart opinions are certainly one of many instruments Medicare Benefit plans use to assist sufferers, determine power situations, and forestall these situations from changing into extra critical,” mentioned Chris Bond, a spokesperson for AHIP, a medical insurance commerce group.
Whistleblowers have argued that the cottage business of analytics corporations and coders that sprang as much as conduct these opinions pitched their providers as an enormous moneymaking train for well being plans — and little else.
“It was by no means professional,” mentioned William Hanagami, a California lawyer who represented whistleblower James Swoben in a 2009 case that alleged chart opinions improperly inflated Medicare funds. In a 2016 determination, the ninth Circuit Court docket of Appeals wrote that well being plans should train “due diligence” to make sure they submit correct information.
Since then, different insurers have settled DOJ allegations that they billed Medicare for unconfirmed diagnoses stemming from chart opinions. In July 2023, Martin’s Level Well being Plan, a Portland, Maine, insurer, paid $22,485,000 to settle whistleblower allegations that it improperly billed for situations starting from diabetes with issues to morbid weight problems. The plan denied any legal responsibility.
A December 2019 report by the Well being and Human Providers Inspector Common discovered that 99% of chart opinions added new medical diagnoses at a price to Medicare of an estimated $6.7 billion for 2017 alone.
KFF Well being Information is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is among the core working packages at KFF—an unbiased supply of well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism. Be taught extra about KFF.
USE OUR CONTENT
This story may be republished free of charge (particulars).
